Comments on: A Study of Romans – An Introduction http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/10/12/a-study-of-romans-an-introduction/ Fear God and keep His commandments; for this is the whole duty of man - Ecclesiastes 12:13 Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:42:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Charles http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/10/12/a-study-of-romans-an-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-920 Charles Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:03:53 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/10/12/a-study-of-romans-an-introduction/#comment-920 Randall, My church is currently going through the book of Romans and my plan is to restart the men's Bible study at my old church and to use this blog as a way of keeping notes and generating discussion. The books you mention are favorites of mine as well. Quintin, This is a hybrid church/blog study, so anyone is welcome to join in. Thanks for the comments, Charles Randall,
My church is currently going through the book of Romans and my plan is to restart the men’s Bible study at my old church and to use this blog as a way of keeping notes and generating discussion.

The books you mention are favorites of mine as well.

Quintin,
This is a hybrid church/blog study, so anyone is welcome to join in.

Thanks for the comments,
Charles

]]> By: Quintin http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/10/12/a-study-of-romans-an-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-921 Quintin Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:49:44 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/10/12/a-study-of-romans-an-introduction/#comment-921 Is this a blog-study? Cause I am soooooo keen! Is this a blog-study? Cause I am soooooo keen!

]]> By: R. Sherman http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/10/12/a-study-of-romans-an-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-924 R. Sherman Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:36:12 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/10/12/a-study-of-romans-an-introduction/#comment-924 Nicely said. I've always thought that if one could read and understand only two of the books of the New Testament, they would be John's Gospel and Paul's letter to the Romans. (Third on my list would be <i>Hebrews</i>. I trust you'll continue this series. Cheers. Nicely said.

I’ve always thought that if one could read and understand only two of the books of the New Testament, they would be John’s Gospel and Paul’s letter to the Romans. (Third on my list would be Hebrews.

I trust you’ll continue this series.

Cheers.

]]> By: Charles http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/10/12/a-study-of-romans-an-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-923 Charles Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:50:32 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/10/12/a-study-of-romans-an-introduction/#comment-923 I did indeed. Thanks for the catch. I did indeed. Thanks for the catch.

]]> By: Jonathan http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/10/12/a-study-of-romans-an-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-922 Jonathan Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:33:19 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/10/12/a-study-of-romans-an-introduction/#comment-922 Do you mean "Read Romans 1:1-7"? Do you mean “Read Romans 1:1-7″?

]]>