Comments on: A question about the scriptural basis for free will http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/ Fear God and keep His commandments; for this is the whole duty of man - Ecclesiastes 12:13 Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:07:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Kingscourtent http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/comment-page-1/#comment-1717 Kingscourtent Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:49:00 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/#comment-1717 How could Abraham be counted as righteous for doing what he couldn't control How could Abraham be counted as righteous for doing what he couldn’t control

]]> By: gymbrall http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/comment-page-1/#comment-980 gymbrall Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:25:46 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/#comment-980 Dan, The references to us as vessels are God's words not mine. I do not question that man chooses. Scripture states over and over that man chooses, but it also states (very explicitly) that man chooses within the predetermined choices of God. This is what Paul is explaining to us in Romans 9. Man chooses, but God chose first. The problem that I have with "free will" is that people who believe in it say something to this effect: <i>Man has free will, therefore any verse that seems to suggest otherwise is completely wrong.</i> Whereas, when I read Scripture I say: <i>God says man chooses. God also says that he chose before the foundations of the world. If there is any contradiction here, it must lie within my understand of it.For if I am willing to dismiss the clear meaning of Romans 9, why should someone else not dismiss the clear meaning of John 3:16?</i> Dan,
The references to us as vessels are God’s words not mine. I do not question that man chooses. Scripture states over and over that man chooses, but it also states (very explicitly) that man chooses within the predetermined choices of God. This is what Paul is explaining to us in Romans 9. Man chooses, but God chose first. The problem that I have with “free will” is that people who believe in it say something to this effect: Man has free will, therefore any verse that seems to suggest otherwise is completely wrong. Whereas, when I read Scripture I say: God says man chooses. God also says that he chose before the foundations of the world. If there is any contradiction here, it must lie within my understand of it.For if I am willing to dismiss the clear meaning of Romans 9, why should someone else not dismiss the clear meaning of John 3:16?

]]> By: gymbrall http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/comment-page-1/#comment-1505 gymbrall Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:25:00 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/#comment-1505 Dan, The references to us as vessels are God's words not mine. I do not question that man chooses. Scripture states over and over that man chooses, but it also states (very explicitly) that man chooses within the predetermined choices of God. This is what Paul is explaining to us in Romans 9. Man chooses, but God chose first. The problem that I have with "free will" is that people who believe in it say something to this effect: <i>Man has free will, therefore any verse that seems to suggest otherwise is completely wrong.</i> Whereas, when I read Scripture I say: <i>God says man chooses. God also says that he chose before the foundations of the world. If there is any contradiction here, it must lie within my understand of it.For if I am willing to dismiss the clear meaning of Romans 9, why should someone else not dismiss the clear meaning of John 3:16?</i> Dan,
The references to us as vessels are God’s words not mine. I do not question that man chooses. Scripture states over and over that man chooses, but it also states (very explicitly) that man chooses within the predetermined choices of God. This is what Paul is explaining to us in Romans 9. Man chooses, but God chose first. The problem that I have with “free will” is that people who believe in it say something to this effect: Man has free will, therefore any verse that seems to suggest otherwise is completely wrong. Whereas, when I read Scripture I say: God says man chooses. God also says that he chose before the foundations of the world. If there is any contradiction here, it must lie within my understand of it.For if I am willing to dismiss the clear meaning of Romans 9, why should someone else not dismiss the clear meaning of John 3:16?

]]> By: Dan http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/comment-page-1/#comment-979 Dan Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:41:41 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/#comment-979 Joshua 24: 14-15 Matthew 7:13 Deut 30:15-20 Additionally, how we think of God becomes drastically different if we think of ourselves as simply 'vessels'. If that was the case, that God was making a perfect pleasure, he would simply speak it into existence. There is, however, pleasure more perfect than such a situation. There is the free choice pleasure. For what is better, a gift from a friend because he is forced, or because he freely chooses too give it to you? I believe the later is far greater. Joshua 24: 14-15
Matthew 7:13
Deut 30:15-20

Additionally, how we think of God becomes drastically different if we think of ourselves as simply ‘vessels’. If that was the case, that God was making a perfect pleasure, he would simply speak it into existence. There is, however, pleasure more perfect than such a situation. There is the free choice pleasure. For what is better, a gift from a friend because he is forced, or because he freely chooses too give it to you? I believe the later is far greater.

]]> By: Dan http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/comment-page-1/#comment-1504 Dan Wed, 17 Sep 2008 23:41:00 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/#comment-1504 Joshua 24: 14-15 Matthew 7:13 Deut 30:15-20 Additionally, how we think of God becomes drastically different if we think of ourselves as simply 'vessels'. If that was the case, that God was making a perfect pleasure, he would simply speak it into existence. There is, however, pleasure more perfect than such a situation. There is the free choice pleasure. For what is better, a gift from a friend because he is forced, or because he freely chooses too give it to you? I believe the later is far greater. Joshua 24: 14-15
Matthew 7:13
Deut 30:15-20

Additionally, how we think of God becomes drastically different if we think of ourselves as simply ‘vessels’. If that was the case, that God was making a perfect pleasure, he would simply speak it into existence. There is, however, pleasure more perfect than such a situation. There is the free choice pleasure. For what is better, a gift from a friend because he is forced, or because he freely chooses too give it to you? I believe the later is far greater.

]]> By: Charles http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/comment-page-1/#comment-976 Charles Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:26:41 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/#comment-976 Chuck, Can I ask you to read through that very same passage you mention and notice what Paul is saying. Actually, you should go back to verse 9. Paul is teaching us about the doctrine of election, or as we would say it, the doctrine of how salvation is chosen (and who does the choosing). As he does this, he is also walking through the objections that we would raise as we come to understand God's purposes. Verses 9-13, he describes the choosing of Jacob over Esau. He makes is clear that God chose them before they were born so it would be clear that was not their works but the choosing of God that was supreme. He says that God loved Jacob and hated Esau. Then in verse 14, he raises the first objection/question that pops into most people's minds as they read this: "But doesn't that make God unrighteous? Isn't god being unfair?" No. says Paul, and he takes you back to Exodus and to the giving of the law when God says, I will show mercy to who I want to show mercy to and compassion to who I want to show compassion. Then he talks about Pharaoh and how God raised Pharaoh up and hardened his heart so that he could punish to God's own glory. Then in verse 19, Paul raises the next objection: "If God makes people the way that they are, how can he then find fault with them? For who can resist the will of God?" To which Paul says, "You have no place to question God. Can a clay vessel complain against the potter? Can clay question the one who shaped it? Doesn't the potter have absolute power over the clay to make over vessel for honor and another for destruction?" But notice, God does not call us toys for His amusement. He calls us vessel of wrath and vessels of mercy. His language is specific. He is not a whimsical God who is doing all of this for his child-like pleasure. He is making a thing, and we are part of it. He is creating something for His perfect pleasure. If we cannot wrap our minds around how our choice can be real when He has made us thus, the we must have faith. It has been sufficient for all other things, let it be sufficient for this as well. Chuck,
Can I ask you to read through that very same passage you mention and notice what Paul is saying. Actually, you should go back to verse 9.
Paul is teaching us about the doctrine of election, or as we would say it, the doctrine of how salvation is chosen (and who does the choosing). As he does this, he is also walking through the objections that we would raise as we come to understand God’s purposes.

Verses 9-13, he describes the choosing of Jacob over Esau. He makes is clear that God chose them before they were born so it would be clear that was not their works but the choosing of God that was supreme. He says that God loved Jacob and hated Esau.

Then in verse 14, he raises the first objection/question that pops into most people’s minds as they read this:

“But doesn’t that make God unrighteous? Isn’t god being unfair?”

No. says Paul, and he takes you back to Exodus and to the giving of the law when God says, I will show mercy to who I want to show mercy to and compassion to who I want to show compassion. Then he talks about Pharaoh and how God raised Pharaoh up and hardened his heart so that he could punish to God’s own glory.

Then in verse 19, Paul raises the next objection: “If God makes people the way that they are, how can he then find fault with them? For who can resist the will of God?”

To which Paul says, “You have no place to question God. Can a clay vessel complain against the potter? Can clay question the one who shaped it? Doesn’t the potter have absolute power over the clay to make over vessel for honor and another for destruction?”

But notice, God does not call us toys for His amusement. He calls us vessel of wrath and vessels of mercy. His language is specific. He is not a whimsical God who is doing all of this for his child-like pleasure. He is making a thing, and we are part of it. He is creating something for His perfect pleasure. If we cannot wrap our minds around how our choice can be real when He has made us thus, the we must have faith. It has been sufficient for all other things, let it be sufficient for this as well.

]]> By: Charles http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/comment-page-1/#comment-1503 Charles Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:26:00 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/#comment-1503 Chuck, Can I ask you to read through that very same passage you mention and notice what Paul is saying. Actually, you should go back to verse 9. Paul is teaching us about the doctrine of election, or as we would say it, the doctrine of how salvation is chosen (and who does the choosing). As he does this, he is also walking through the objections that we would raise as we come to understand God's purposes. Verses 9-13, he describes the choosing of Jacob over Esau. He makes is clear that God chose them before they were born so it would be clear that was not their works but the choosing of God that was supreme. He says that God loved Jacob and hated Esau. Then in verse 14, he raises the first objection/question that pops into most people's minds as they read this: "But doesn't that make God unrighteous? Isn't god being unfair?" No. says Paul, and he takes you back to Exodus and to the giving of the law when God says, I will show mercy to who I want to show mercy to and compassion to who I want to show compassion. Then he talks about Pharaoh and how God raised Pharaoh up and hardened his heart so that he could punish to God's own glory. Then in verse 19, Paul raises the next objection: "If God makes people the way that they are, how can he then find fault with them? For who can resist the will of God?" To which Paul says, "You have no place to question God. Can a clay vessel complain against the potter? Can clay question the one who shaped it? Doesn't the potter have absolute power over the clay to make over vessel for honor and another for destruction?" But notice, God does not call us toys for His amusement. He calls us vessel of wrath and vessels of mercy. His language is specific. He is not a whimsical God who is doing all of this for his child-like pleasure. He is making a thing, and we are part of it. He is creating something for His perfect pleasure. If we cannot wrap our minds around how our choice can be real when He has made us thus, the we must have faith. It has been sufficient for all other things, let it be sufficient for this as well. Chuck,
Can I ask you to read through that very same passage you mention and notice what Paul is saying. Actually, you should go back to verse 9.
Paul is teaching us about the doctrine of election, or as we would say it, the doctrine of how salvation is chosen (and who does the choosing). As he does this, he is also walking through the objections that we would raise as we come to understand God’s purposes.

Verses 9-13, he describes the choosing of Jacob over Esau. He makes is clear that God chose them before they were born so it would be clear that was not their works but the choosing of God that was supreme. He says that God loved Jacob and hated Esau.

Then in verse 14, he raises the first objection/question that pops into most people’s minds as they read this:

“But doesn’t that make God unrighteous? Isn’t god being unfair?”

No. says Paul, and he takes you back to Exodus and to the giving of the law when God says, I will show mercy to who I want to show mercy to and compassion to who I want to show compassion. Then he talks about Pharaoh and how God raised Pharaoh up and hardened his heart so that he could punish to God’s own glory.

Then in verse 19, Paul raises the next objection: “If God makes people the way that they are, how can he then find fault with them? For who can resist the will of God?”

To which Paul says, “You have no place to question God. Can a clay vessel complain against the potter? Can clay question the one who shaped it? Doesn’t the potter have absolute power over the clay to make over vessel for honor and another for destruction?”

But notice, God does not call us toys for His amusement. He calls us vessel of wrath and vessels of mercy. His language is specific. He is not a whimsical God who is doing all of this for his child-like pleasure. He is making a thing, and we are part of it. He is creating something for His perfect pleasure. If we cannot wrap our minds around how our choice can be real when He has made us thus, the we must have faith. It has been sufficient for all other things, let it be sufficient for this as well.

]]> By: Chuck http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/comment-page-1/#comment-970 Chuck Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:14:38 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/#comment-970 While God knows how we will exercise our free will; he does not choose for us as such. For example, God knows that Bob refuses to accept Christ as his savior. God knew before Bob did that Bob would reject Christ. God would then likely be disappointed in Bob, but Bob has the will/choice to refuse Christ. I don't know that there needs to be one, two, or even twenty options to choose from when making a choice. It only matters that God knows our choice before we do without choosing for us. Here is one for you. Read Romans 9:18-23. If God chooses to pre-determine what or who we are or what we become. Then might we just be toys for his amusement or perhaps examples by which we make choices to emulate, or not? While God knows how we will exercise our free will; he does not choose for us as such. For example, God knows that Bob refuses to accept Christ as his savior. God knew before Bob did that Bob would reject Christ. God would then likely be disappointed in Bob, but Bob has the will/choice to refuse Christ. I don’t know that there needs to be one, two, or even twenty options to choose from when making a choice. It only matters that God knows our choice before we do without choosing for us.

Here is one for you. Read Romans 9:18-23. If God chooses to pre-determine what or who we are or what we become. Then might we just be toys for his amusement or perhaps examples by which we make choices to emulate, or not?

]]> By: Chuck http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/comment-page-1/#comment-1502 Chuck Tue, 17 Jun 2008 04:14:00 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/#comment-1502 While God knows how we will exercise our free will; he does not choose for us as such. For example, God knows that Bob refuses to accept Christ as his savior. God knew before Bob did that Bob would reject Christ. God would then likely be disappointed in Bob, but Bob has the will/choice to refuse Christ. I don't know that there needs to be one, two, or even twenty options to choose from when making a choice. It only matters that God knows our choice before we do without choosing for us. Here is one for you. Read Romans 9:18-23. If God chooses to pre-determine what or who we are or what we become. Then might we just be toys for his amusement or perhaps examples by which we make choices to emulate, or not? While God knows how we will exercise our free will; he does not choose for us as such. For example, God knows that Bob refuses to accept Christ as his savior. God knew before Bob did that Bob would reject Christ. God would then likely be disappointed in Bob, but Bob has the will/choice to refuse Christ. I don’t know that there needs to be one, two, or even twenty options to choose from when making a choice. It only matters that God knows our choice before we do without choosing for us.

Here is one for you. Read Romans 9:18-23. If God chooses to pre-determine what or who we are or what we become. Then might we just be toys for his amusement or perhaps examples by which we make choices to emulate, or not?

]]> By: Charles http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/comment-page-1/#comment-694 Charles Tue, 10 Jul 2007 01:37:21 +0000 http://thepreacher.cac2.net/2007/07/03/a-question-about-the-scriptural-basis-for-free-will/#comment-694 Sam, Jamie, Randall, Quentin, I don't think I stated the question very well. I'm not so much asking whether there aren't two available options to a person, what I'm asking is why do we believe that a person can always choose either of those two options. In a follow-up post, I try the example of life vs death, There are days that given the choice, we could not choose death (most days for most people I would hope). I think Quintin stated it very well. The decision that we made at that precise time with that precise background, with that precise situation, and so on, is the decision we would always make with that same background, the same time, the same situation, etc. It is all of those things that make us who we are and give us the reason for what we do. I hope that makes more sense, Thanks for the dialogue!! Sam, Jamie, Randall, Quentin,
I don’t think I stated the question very well. I’m not so much asking whether there aren’t two available options to a person, what I’m asking is why do we believe that a person can always choose either of those two options. In a follow-up post, I try the example of life vs death, There are days that given the choice, we could not choose death (most days for most people I would hope). I think Quintin stated it very well. The decision that we made at that precise time with that precise background, with that precise situation, and so on, is the decision we would always make with that same background, the same time, the same situation, etc. It is all of those things that make us who we are and give us the reason for what we do.

I hope that makes more sense,
Thanks for the dialogue!!

]]>