Skip to content

Al Mohler, Ann Coulter, John Edwards, and the word “faggot”

2007 March 14

Apparently Ann Coulter recently called John Edwards a faggot and Al Mohler has written a piece distancing himself from her actions. And while I agree with Mohler in general, here’s where I start to lose the thread of his argument:

Conservative institutions cannot afford any association with this kind of language or attack. The issues are far too serious to be treated in this manner, and the very convictions Ann Coulter often defends are now sullied by association with her. Referring to John Edwards by using a word meant to demean homosexuals? What was she thinking?

How about saying that Christians cannot afford any association with this kind of language or atttack. How about saying that because sodomy is a serious sin in the eyes of God, it should not be mocked (something I am guilty of) by making a joke out of it. In other words, the problem with the word “faggot” is not that it is offensive to “homosexuals”, but because it is offensive to God in that it makes light of sin. As I think about this, I am convinced that by distancing himself from Ann Coulter’s comments for the reasons he states, Dr. Mohler is demonstrating how easily we fear men more than we fear God. I should also say that I’m not accusing Dr. Mohler of something that I haven’t done myself many, many times. In fact, I probably do it every day without thinking about it. And that’s the problem I’m addressing. Ann Coulter may very well be a jerk. She might be rude and crude and downright mean. But the problem is not with Ann Coulter. The problem is with Christians who are not holy. The problem, is that we don’t fear God.

  • I definitely think that there is an area for commenting on political implications, it's just that the political implications almost never include God as a constituent. I'm learning that our spontaneous rhetoric is shaped by our beliefs and not so much the other way around. I think if God were taken into account, most political implications would look very different. Here in this case, it seems like Dr. Mohler (who I respect quite a bit) is not considering how this looks to God. I'm taking issue with the fact that as Christians, we are so quick to mention anyone who may have been slighted, but we do not feel the need to publicly declare how we have insulted God. (I place myself firmly in the guilty camp on this issue)

    Thanks for stopping by Ariel. You make me think these things through.
  • You're right about the core issue here, I think. Taking sin lightly is a more grievous offense than hurting one's political image. I wonder if there is a place for commenting on the political implications of such rhetoric, though, as Mohler seems to be doing. He is, after all, involved in the political sphere. What do you think?
blog comments powered by Disqus
FireStats icon Powered by FireStats